Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The Bio:Fiction film festival: Sensing how a debate about synthetic biology might evolve
Authors: Schmidt, Markus 
Meyer, Angela 
Cserer, Amelie 
Issue Date: 28-Oct-2013
Publisher: Sage
Source: Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 619-635
Project: CYSINBIO: Cynema and Synthetic Biology. GEN-AU / ELSA 
Journal: Public Understanding of Science 
Abstract: Synthetic biology (SB) is a new techno-scientific field surrounded by an aura of hope, hype and fear. Currently it is difficult to predict which way the public debate - and thus the social shaping of technology - is heading. With limited hard evidence at hand, we resort to a strategy that takes into account speculative design and diegetic prototyping, accessing the Bio:Fiction science film festival, and its 52 short films from international independent filmmakers. Our first hypothesis was that these films could be used as an indicator of a public debate to come. The second hypothesis was that SB would most likely not follow the debate around genetic engineering (framing technology as conflict) as assumed by many observers. Instead, we found good evidence for two alternative comparators, namely nanotechnology (technology as progress) and information technology (technology as gadget) as stronger attractors for an upcoming public debate on SB.
ISSN: 0963-6625
DOI: 10.1177/0963662513503772
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Appears in Collections:Wirtschaft (mit Schwerpunkt Zentral-Osteuropa)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Bio-fiction-PUS.pdfBio-fiction.PUS.pdf454.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
SFX Query Show full item record

PubMed Central
Citations 1

checked on Jul 25, 2021


checked on Jul 25, 2021

Page view(s) 20

Last Week
Last month
checked on Jul 25, 2021

Download(s) 20

checked on Jul 25, 2021

Google ScholarTM




Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.