Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Closing the Gap Between U.S. and German Managerial Accounting
Authors: Zehetner, Karl 
Eschenbach, Sebastian 
Keywords: International accounting;Design of accounting systems;Integrated accounting;Dual-cycle accounting;GPK system;Resource consumption accounting;Mass customization;ERP system
Issue Date: 2017
Source: Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 7(2), 461–474
Journal: Humanities and Social Sciences Review 
Abstract: The effect of the continuous process of globalization on management functions like marketing and sales, production, or R&D is well researched. But the forces of globalization are also effective for management support functions. A good example is managerial accounting with its distinct standards and methods in different economies. Managerial, as well as financial accounting, are pretty different in German-speaking countries, compared to the United States. This may be surprising because the goals ‐ giving the public a true and fair view, and supporting managerial decisions ‐ are the same everywhere. Recently, a convergence between these systems can be observed in business practice, triggered by the development of ERP systems, by regulatory requirements, and by changes in management thinking. Our paper aims (1) to explain the deeper economic, legal and cultural reasons for the national differences in the design of accounting systems, and (2) to uncover the driving forces behind the recent development of convergence. In addition to summarizing the relevant literature, we draw from experience in implementing and assessing managerial accounting systems both in German‐speaking countries and in North America.
ISSN: 2165-6258
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Appears in Collections:Wirtschaft (mit Schwerpunkt Zentral-Osteuropa)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
V7G267.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
SFX Query Show full item record

Page view(s) 20

Last Week
Last month
checked on Aug 5, 2021

Download(s) 10

checked on Aug 5, 2021

Google ScholarTM


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons